rotor: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.56
, electric motor
Weight: 0.51
, game
Weight: 0.50
, application
Weight: 0.50
Siblings caliper
Weight: 0.63
, stator
Weight: 0.55
, flagellum
Weight: 0.41
, valve
Weight: 0.33
, nozzle
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
be put on wrong 0.80
has quality bad 0.79
be put on wrong on 2000 buick lasabre 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rotor, go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(game, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(valve, go bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(stator, go bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(caliper, go bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rotor, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(valve, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(valve, go bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(stator, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(stator, go bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(caliper, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(caliper, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(rotor, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rotor, be put on wrong)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(rotor, be put on wrong)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rotor, be put on wrong on 2000 buick lasabre)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(rotor, be put on wrong)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(rotor, be put on wrong)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rotor, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rotor, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(valve, go bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(stator, go bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(caliper, go bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(rotor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)