business: be at business district

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.56
Siblings barber shop
Weight: 0.72
, department store
Weight: 0.71
, business card
Weight: 0.68
, software company
Weight: 0.67
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at business district 1.00
be at city 0.80
be at town 0.77
be a part of business community 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(industry, be at city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(business, be at business district)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(business, be at business district)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(market, be at town)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(business, be at business district)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(market, be at city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(market, be at town)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(industry, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(market, be at town)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(industry, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(barber shop, be at town)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(department store, be at city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(industry, be at city)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(business, be at business district)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(business, be at business district)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(market, be at town)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(business, be at business district)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(barber shop, be at town)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(barber shop, be at town)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(department store, be at city)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(department store, be at city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(business, be at business district)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(business, be a part of business community)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(business, be at city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(business, be at city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(business, be at city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(business, be a part of business community)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(business, be a part of business community)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(business, be at city)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(business, be a part of business community)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(business, be at business district)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(business, be at business district)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(industry, be at city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(market, be at town)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(market, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(department store, be at city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(barber shop, be at town)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(industry, be at city)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(market, be at town)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(business, be at business district)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(market, be at city)