market: be at city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock market
Weight: 0.68
, country
Weight: 0.60
, business activity
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dealer
Weight: 0.66
, company
Weight: 0.64
, unit
Weight: 0.61
, quebec city
Weight: 0.61
, mobile
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at city 1.00
be make up of city 0.88
be at big city 0.87
be at town 0.85
be at any large city 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(country, be make up of city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(market, be at city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(country, be make up of city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(country, be make up of city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(company, be at city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(company, be at town)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(company, be at any large city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(country, be make up of city)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(market, be at city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(company, be at city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(company, be at city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(company, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(company, be at big city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(company, be at any large city)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(company, be at any large city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(company, be at town)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(company, be at town)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(market, be at city)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(market, be at town)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(market, be at town)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(market, be at town)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(market, be at town)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(market, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(country, be make up of city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(company, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(company, be at town)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(company, be at big city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(company, be at any large city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(market, be at city)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(country, be make up of city)