businessman: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.57
, friend
Weight: 0.56
, resident
Weight: 0.55
, student
Weight: 0.55
Siblings banker
Weight: 0.59
, entrepreneur
Weight: 0.36
, old man
Weight: 0.35
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality evil 0.80
has quality joke 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(businessman, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(resident, has quality evil)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(resident, has quality evil)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(banker, has quality evil)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(businessman, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(banker, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(banker, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(businessman, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(businessman, has quality evil)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(businessman, has quality evil)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(businessman, has quality joke)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(businessman, has quality joke)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(businessman, has quality joke)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(businessman, has quality joke)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(businessman, has quality evil)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(businessman, has quality evil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(businessman, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(businessman, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(resident, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(banker, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(businessman, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(resident, has quality evil)