resident: has quality evil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.61
, community
Weight: 0.61
, user
Weight: 0.56
, employee
Weight: 0.55
Siblings elderly person
Weight: 0.64
, naturalist
Weight: 0.55
, businessman
Weight: 0.55
, settler
Weight: 0.54
, gardener
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality evil 1.00
is evil good 0.93
evil 0.93
was evil 0.93
is evil different 0.91
is evil short 0.88
be evil 2 0.88
was evil ps1 good 0.86
be evil 5 0.86
is evil 7 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(businessman, has quality evil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(businessman, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(businessman, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(resident, has quality evil)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(resident, was evil)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(resident, evil)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(resident, is evil 7)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(resident, was evil)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(resident, was evil ps1 good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(resident, is evil different)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(resident, is evil 7)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(resident, evil)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(resident, be evil 2)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(resident, was evil)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(resident, is evil different)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(resident, be evil 5)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(resident, is evil short)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(resident, was evil ps1 good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(resident, is evil 7)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resident, be evil 2)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(resident, is evil 7)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(resident, was evil ps1 good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(resident, is evil good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(resident, is evil good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(resident, was evil)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(resident, be evil 2)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(resident, be evil 5)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(resident, is evil short)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(resident, was evil ps1 good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(resident, evil)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(resident, is evil different)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(resident, be evil 5)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(resident, be evil 2)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(resident, is evil different)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(resident, evil)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(resident, be evil 5)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(resident, is evil short)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(resident, is evil short)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(resident, is evil good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(resident, is evil good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(resident, has quality evil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(resident, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(resident, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(businessman, has quality evil)