resident: be evil 2

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.61
, community
Weight: 0.61
, user
Weight: 0.56
, employee
Weight: 0.55
Siblings elderly person
Weight: 0.64
, naturalist
Weight: 0.55
, businessman
Weight: 0.55
, settler
Weight: 0.54
, gardener
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be evil 2 1.00
be evil 5 0.99
is evil 7 0.97
evil 0.94
was evil 0.93
is evil 7 scary 0.91
is evil good 0.91
is evil different 0.91
is evil 5 m 0.89
is evil short 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(resident, be evil 2)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(resident, is evil 7 scary)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(resident, is evil 7 scary)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(resident, is evil 7 scary)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(resident, is evil 7)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(resident, is evil 7)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(resident, be evil 5)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(resident, is evil 7 scary)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(resident, is evil 7)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(resident, is evil 7)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(resident, be evil 5)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(resident, be evil 5)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(resident, was evil)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(resident, evil)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(resident, is evil 5 m)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(resident, be evil 5)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(resident, is evil different)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(resident, was evil)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(resident, was evil)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(resident, evil)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(resident, is evil short)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(resident, is evil different)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(resident, is evil 5 m)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(resident, is evil 5 m)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(resident, was evil)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(resident, evil)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(resident, is evil good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(resident, is evil different)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(resident, is evil short)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(resident, is evil 5 m)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(resident, is evil good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(resident, evil)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(resident, is evil different)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(resident, is evil short)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(resident, is evil short)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(resident, is evil good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(resident, is evil good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(resident, be evil 2)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(resident, be evil 2)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resident, be evil 2)