resident: evil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.61
, community
Weight: 0.61
, user
Weight: 0.56
, employee
Weight: 0.55
Siblings elderly person
Weight: 0.64
, naturalist
Weight: 0.55
, businessman
Weight: 0.55
, settler
Weight: 0.54
, gardener
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
evil 1.00
was evil 0.97
is evil good 0.96
is evil different 0.95
be evil 2 0.94
has quality evil 0.93
be evil 5 0.91
is evil short 0.91
is evil 7 0.91
was evil ps1 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(resident, evil)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(businessman, has quality evil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resident, evil)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(businessman, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(businessman, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resident, evil)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(resident, evil)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(resident, evil)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(resident, was evil)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(resident, evil)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(resident, was evil)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(resident, evil)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(resident, is evil different)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(resident, evil)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(resident, is evil 7)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(resident, evil)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resident, be evil 2)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(resident, evil)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(resident, evil)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(resident, evil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resident, evil)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(resident, evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(resident, evil)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(businessman, has quality evil)