buying: be better option renting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, crime
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.56
, contract
Weight: 0.54
Siblings buy
Weight: 0.35
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, shopping
Weight: 0.33
, spending
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better option renting 1.00
be better renting 0.94
be more beneficial renting 0.92
is renting 0.91
be better investment renting 0.90
be cheaper buying 0.81
be cheaper buying individually 0.79
is cheaper on-site 0.78
is cheaper 0.78
is expensive now 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(buying, be better option renting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(buy, is cheaper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(buying, be better option renting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(buy, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(buy, is cheaper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(buying, be better option renting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(buying, be better option renting)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(buying, be better option renting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(buying, is renting)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(buying, be better option renting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(buying, is renting)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(buying, be better option renting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(buying, be better renting)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(buying, be better option renting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(buying, be better renting)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(buying, be better option renting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(buying, is renting)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(buying, be better option renting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(buying, be better option renting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(buying, be better option renting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(buying, be better option renting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(buying, be better option renting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(buying, be better option renting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(buy, is cheaper)