cabinet: be at build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents committee
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, product
Weight: 0.57
, detail
Weight: 0.57
Siblings file cabinet
Weight: 0.76
, council
Weight: 0.34
, senate
Weight: 0.33
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.33
, congress
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at build 1.00
be at office build 0.87
be at council build 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cabinet, be at build)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cabinet, be at build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(committee, be at office build)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cabinet, be at build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at office build)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cabinet, be at build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council build)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.18
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(cabinet, be at build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cabinet, be at build)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cabinet, be at build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(council, be at council build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(council, be at council build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cabinet, be at build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cabinet, be at build)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cabinet, be at build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cabinet, be at build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cabinet, be at build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cabinet, be at build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cabinet, be at build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cabinet, be at build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(committee, be at office build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cabinet, be at build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(council, be at council build)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(cabinet, be at build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(committee, be at office build)