council: be at council build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents authority
Weight: 0.71
, city
Weight: 0.67
, committee
Weight: 0.65
, organization
Weight: 0.64
Siblings town
Weight: 0.64
, senate
Weight: 0.63
, brent
Weight: 0.44
, quebec city
Weight: 0.36
, board
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at council build 1.00
be at city council meet 0.93
be at council chamber 0.88
be at city 0.78
be at build 0.77
be at office build 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(committee, be at city council meet)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(council, be at council build)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(council, be at council build)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(committee, be at city council meet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(committee, be at office build)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city council meet)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at office build)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(town, be at city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(board, be at build)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(committee, be at city council meet)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(council, be at council build)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(council, be at council build)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(town, be at city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(town, be at city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(board, be at build)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(board, be at build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(council, be at council build)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(council, be at council chamber)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(council, be at council chamber)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council chamber)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(council, be at council chamber)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(council, be at council build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(committee, be at city council meet)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(committee, be at office build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(board, be at build)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(town, be at city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(committee, be at city council meet)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(council, be at council build)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(committee, be at office build)