cactus: be adapted to desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.60
, potted plant
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, object
Weight: 0.53
Siblings yucca
Weight: 0.54
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.34
, shrub
Weight: 0.34
, apple tree
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be adapted to desert 1.00
be adapted to deserts 0.93
adapt to desert 0.93
be in desert 0.87
be important in desert 0.86
survive in desert 0.85
live in desert 0.85
get water in desert 0.83
survive desert climate 0.83
grow in desert 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(plant, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(plant, be in desert)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(plant, be in desert)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(plant, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cactus, be adapted to desert)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cactus, be in desert)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cactus, be in desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cactus, live in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cactus, live in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cactus, survive in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cactus, survive in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cactus, be in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cactus, survive in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cactus, live in desert)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cactus, get water in desert)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cactus, get water in desert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cactus, grow in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cactus, get water in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cactus, adapt to desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cactus, live in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cactus, grow in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cactus, get water in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cactus, survive in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cactus, adapt to desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cactus, adapt to desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cactus, adapt to desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cactus, be important in desert)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be important in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cactus, be important in desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cactus, be important in desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cactus, grow in desert)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cactus, grow in desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, be in desert)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, be in desert)