cactus: be at desert

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, object
Weight: 0.53
, water plant
Weight: 0.51
Siblings vegetable garden
Weight: 0.34
, shrub
Weight: 0.34
, apple tree
Weight: 0.34
, moss
Weight: 0.34
, ficus
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at desert 1.00
be find in desert 0.97
grow in desert 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ficus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cactus, be at desert)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(cactus, be find in desert)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be find in desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cactus, grow in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cactus, grow in desert)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cactus, be find in desert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cactus, grow in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(cactus, be find in desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cactus, grow in desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be at desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cactus, be at desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ficus, be at desert)