cactus: be find in desert

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, object
Weight: 0.53
, water plant
Weight: 0.51
Siblings vegetable garden
Weight: 0.34
, shrub
Weight: 0.34
, apple tree
Weight: 0.34
, moss
Weight: 0.34
, ficus
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be find in desert 1.00
be at desert 0.97
grow in desert 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ficus, be at desert)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(cactus, be find in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cactus, be at desert)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be at desert)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cactus, be at desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cactus, grow in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cactus, grow in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cactus, grow in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cactus, be at desert)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cactus, grow in desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be find in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cactus, be find in desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be find in desert)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ficus, be at desert)