cafeteria: has quality service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.62
, room
Weight: 0.61
, high school
Weight: 0.59
, classroom
Weight: 0.59
Siblings school cafeteria
Weight: 0.38
, dining room
Weight: 0.36
, laundry room
Weight: 0.36
, auditorium
Weight: 0.35
, gymnasium
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality service 1.00
go customer service department 0.83
require community service 0.83
has quality good 0.81
has quality better 0.80
has quality bad 0.79
has quality utility 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(room, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classroom, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(room, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(classroom, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(classroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(room, go customer service department)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(high school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(high school, require community service)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(high school, require community service)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(room, go customer service department)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(high school, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(classroom, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(classroom, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(room, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(classroom, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(room, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(high school, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(classroom, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(room, go customer service department)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(room, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(classroom, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(room, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(classroom, has quality better)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(high school, require community service)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(room, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classroom, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(room, go customer service department)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(classroom, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(room, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(classroom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(high school, require community service)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(high school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cafeteria, has quality service)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(high school, require community service)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(room, go customer service department)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(high school, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(classroom, has quality better)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(classroom, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(room, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(classroom, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(room, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(high school, require community service)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(room, go customer service department)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(high school, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(classroom, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(classroom, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(room, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(classroom, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(room, has quality bad)