cafeteria: has quality service

Related concepts

Parents	facility Weight: 0.63 , place Weight: 0.62 , room Weight: 0.61 , high school Weight: 0.59 , classroom Weight: 0.59
Siblings	school cafeteria Weight: 0.38 , dining room Weight: 0.36 , laundry room Weight: 0.36 , auditorium Weight: 0.35 , gymnasium Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality service	1.00
go customer service department	0.83
require community service	0.83
has quality good	0.81
has quality better	0.80
has quality bad	0.79
has quality utility	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(room, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(classroom, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(room, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(classroom, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(classroom, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)

...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(high school, require community service)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(room, go customer service department)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(high school, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(classroom, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(classroom, has quality good)

...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(high school, has quality bad)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(classroom, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(room, go customer service department)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(room, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(classroom, has quality good)

...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(room, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(classroom, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(room, go customer service department) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(classroom, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(room, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service)

...

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(cafeteria, has quality service)

Similarity expansion

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(cafeteria, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(cafeteria, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cafeteria, has quality service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(high school, require community service)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(room, go customer service department)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(high school, has quality bad)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(classroom, has quality better)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(classroom, has quality good)

...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(high school, require community service)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(room, go customer service department)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(high school, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(classroom, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(cafeteria, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(classroom, has quality better)

...