cage: is free chicken

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.60
, artist
Weight: 0.55
, bird
Weight: 0.52
, device
Weight: 0.50
Siblings crate
Weight: 0.33
, barn owl
Weight: 0.32
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.32
, fence
Weight: 0.32
, doorknob
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is free chicken 1.00
is free chicken better 0.97
is chicken 0.92
is chicken better 0.89
is free eggs 0.85
is free eggs better 0.84
is free 0.80
is free better 0.78
is eggs better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cage, is free chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fence, is free)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cage, is free chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fence, is free) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fence, is free)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cage, is free chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cage, is free chicken)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cage, is free chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cage, is free chicken better)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cage, is free chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cage, is free chicken better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cage, is free chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cage, is free chicken better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cage, is free chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cage, is free chicken better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cage, is free chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cage, is chicken)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(cage, is free chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cage, is free chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cage, is free chicken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cage, is free chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cage, is free chicken)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cage, is free chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fence, is free)