calculator: was invented

Related concepts

Parents	tool Weight: 0.68 , application Weight: 0.63 , electronic device Weight: 0.61 , function Weight: 0.60
Siblings	abacus Weight: 0.47 , spreadsheet Weight: 0.36 , pencil sharpener Weight: 0.34 , app Weight: 0.34 , compass Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was invented	1.00
is invented	0.98
were invented	0.97
be like shazam developed	0.76
is is used	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(tool, is invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(calculator, was invented)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(tool, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(calculator, was invented)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(tool, is is used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(calculator, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(tool, were invented)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(tool, is invented)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(tool, is is used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(tool, is invented)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(tool, is is used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(abacus, is invented)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(compass, were invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(tool, is invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(calculator, was invented)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(tool, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(calculator, was invented)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(tool, is is used) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(calculator, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(abacus, is invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(abacus, is invented)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(compass, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(compass, were invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(calculator, was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(calculator, is invented)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(calculator, were invented)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(calculator, is invented)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(calculator, were invented)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(calculator, is invented)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(calculator, were invented)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(calculator, is invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(calculator, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(calculator, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(tool, is is used)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(tool, is invented)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(tool, were invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(compass, were invented)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(abacus, is invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(tool, is invented)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(tool, were invented)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(calculator, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(tool, is is used)