calculator: were invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.68
, application
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
Siblings abacus
Weight: 0.47
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.36
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.34
, app
Weight: 0.34
, compass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were invented 1.00
was invented 0.97
is invented 0.96
be like shazam developed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(tool, is invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calculator, were invented)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tool, were invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calculator, were invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tool, were invented)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(tool, is invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tool, is invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(compass, were invented)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(abacus, is invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tool, were invented)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(calculator, were invented)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(tool, is invented)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(calculator, were invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(compass, were invented)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(compass, were invented)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(abacus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(abacus, is invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(calculator, were invented)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(calculator, was invented)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(calculator, is invented)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(calculator, was invented)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(calculator, is invented)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(calculator, was invented)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(calculator, is invented)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(calculator, was invented)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calculator, is invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calculator, were invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tool, were invented)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tool, is invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(compass, were invented)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(abacus, is invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tool, were invented)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(calculator, were invented)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tool, is invented)