calculator: were invented

Related concepts

Parents	tool Weight: 0.68 , application Weight: 0.63 , electronic device Weight: 0.61 , function Weight: 0.60
Siblings	abacus Weight: 0.47 , spreadsheet Weight: 0.36 , pencil sharpener Weight: 0.34 , app Weight: 0.34 , compass Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were invented	1.00
was invented	0.97
is invented	0.96
be like shazam developed	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(tool, is invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(calculator, were invented)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(tool, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(calculator, were invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(tool, were invented)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(tool, is invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(tool, is invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(compass, were invented)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(abacus, is invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(tool, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(calculator, were invented)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(tool, is invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(calculator, were invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(compass, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(compass, were invented)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(abacus, is invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(abacus, is invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(calculator, were invented)

Similarity expansion

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(calculator, was invented)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(calculator, is invented)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(calculator, was invented)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(calculator, is invented)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(calculator, was invented)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(calculator, were invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(tool, were invented)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(tool, is invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(compass, were invented)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(abacus, is invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(tool, were invented)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(calculator, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(tool, is invented)