calculus: be considered mathematics of change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents math
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, course
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
Siblings linear algebra
Weight: 0.64
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, algebra
Weight: 0.34
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.33
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered mathematics of change 1.00
mathematics of change 0.97
be considered mathematics 0.96
be important in math 0.85
be different from algebra 0.80
be applied to economics 0.79
be important for physics 0.79
be important in physics 0.79
be emphasized in computer science 0.79
be needed for computer science 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be important in physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(math, be important in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be important in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important in physics)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be important in physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mathematics, be important in physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important in physics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics of change)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important in math)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be different from algebra)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important for physics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be applied to economics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be applied to economics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important in physics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(calculus, be applied to economics)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(calculus, be applied to economics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(calculus, be different from algebra)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(calculus, be applied to economics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(calculus, be applied to economics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(calculus, be applied to economics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(calculus, be applied to economics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(calculus, be important in math)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(calculus, be different from algebra)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(calculus, be important in physics)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(calculus, be important in physics)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(calculus, be important in physics)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(calculus, be important for physics)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(calculus, be different from algebra)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(calculus, be important in math)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(calculus, be important for physics)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(calculus, be important for physics)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(calculus, be important in math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(math, be important in physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important in physics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(math, be important in physics)