calculus: be needed for computer science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents math
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, course
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
Siblings linear algebra
Weight: 0.64
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, algebra
Weight: 0.34
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.33
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed for computer science 1.00
be required for computer science 0.97
be emphasized in computer science 0.87
be useful in science 0.85
be integrated into computer science 0.85
be connected to science 0.82
be important for physics 0.79
be considered mathematics of change 0.78
be important in biology 0.78
be used in physics 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(math, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(math, be used in physics)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(math, be useful in science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(math, be used in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be useful in science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in physics)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(math, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(math, be used in physics)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(calculus, be used in physics)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(calculus, be useful in science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(calculus, be useful in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(calculus, be used in physics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(calculus, be connected to science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(calculus, be useful in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(calculus, be used in physics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics of change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(calculus, be important for physics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(calculus, be important in biology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important for physics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important in biology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(calculus, be important in biology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(calculus, be important in biology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(calculus, be important for physics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(calculus, be important for physics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be used in physics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(math, be useful in science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(math, be used in physics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(math, be useful in science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(math, be used in physics)