calculus: be required for computer science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents math
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, course
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
Siblings linear algebra
Weight: 0.64
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, algebra
Weight: 0.34
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.33
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be required for computer science 1.00
be needed for computer science 0.97
be emphasized in computer science 0.86
be integrated into computer science 0.85
be useful in science 0.83
be connected to science 0.80
be used in physics 0.78
be important for physics 0.78
be considered mathematics of change 0.78
be considered mathematics 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(math, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(math, be used in physics)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(math, be useful in science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(math, be used in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be useful in science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in physics)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(math, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(math, be used in physics)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(calculus, be used in physics)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(calculus, be useful in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(calculus, be used in physics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(calculus, be considered mathematics of change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(calculus, be used in physics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(calculus, be useful in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(calculus, be useful in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(calculus, be connected to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics of change)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(calculus, be considered mathematics of change)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(calculus, be considered mathematics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(calculus, be important for physics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(calculus, be important for physics)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important for physics)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics of change)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(calculus, be important for physics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be considered mathematics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be used in physics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(math, be useful in science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(math, be used in physics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(math, be useful in science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(math, be used in physics)