calculus: be integrated into computer science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents math
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, course
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
Siblings linear algebra
Weight: 0.64
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, algebra
Weight: 0.34
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.33
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be integrated into computer science 1.00
be required for computer science 0.85
be needed for computer science 0.85
be emphasized in computer science 0.81
be connected to science 0.81
be useful in science 0.79
be useful in engineering 0.76
be important in biology 0.76
be important for engineering 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(math, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(math, be useful in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be useful in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(math, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(calculus, be useful in engineering)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(calculus, be useful in science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(calculus, be useful in engineering)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important in biology)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in engineering)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(calculus, be useful in science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(calculus, be connected to science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(calculus, be useful in engineering)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(calculus, be important in biology)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(calculus, be useful in science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(calculus, be important in biology)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(calculus, be important in biology)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(calculus, be important for engineering)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(calculus, be important for engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(math, be useful in science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(math, be useful in science)