calculus: be important for engineering

Related concepts

Parents	math Weight: 0.61 , topic Weight: 0.60 , thing Weight: 0.59 , course Weight: 0.59 , subject Weight: 0.58
Siblings	linear algebra Weight: 0.64 , mathematics Weight: 0.35 , algebra Weight: 0.34 , arithmetic Weight: 0.33 , boolean algebra Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important for engineering	1.00
be useful in engineering	0.94
be important in biology	0.79
be important for physics	0.78
be needed for computer science	0.77
be important in physics	0.76
be important in economics	0.76
be integrated into computer science	0.75
be helpful for biology majors	0.75
be required for computer science	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(math, be important in physics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(calculus, be important for engineering)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(math, be important in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(math, be important in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important in physics)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(math, be important in physics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(mathematics, be important in physics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important in physics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(calculus, be important for engineering)

Similarity expansion

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(calculus, be useful in engineering)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(calculus, be useful in engineering)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(calculus, be useful in engineering)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(calculus, be important in biology)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(calculus, be important for physics)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(calculus, be important in physics)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in engineering)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(calculus, be important in economics)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(calculus, be important in biology)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(calculus, be helpful for biology majors)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(calculus, be important in biology)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(calculus, be important in physics)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(calculus, be important for physics)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(calculus, be important for physics)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(calculus, be important in physics)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(calculus, be important in economics)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(calculus, be important in economics)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(calculus, be helpful for biology majors)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(calculus, be helpful for biology majors)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be helpful for biology majors)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important in biology)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important for physics)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important in economics)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important in physics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(calculus, be important for engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(math, be important in physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(mathematics, be important in physics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(calculus, be important for engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(math, be important in physics)