calculus: be connected to science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents math
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, course
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
Siblings linear algebra
Weight: 0.64
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, algebra
Weight: 0.34
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.33
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be connected to science 1.00
be useful in science 0.84
be needed for computer science 0.82
be integrated into computer science 0.81
be required for computer science 0.80
be emphasized in computer science 0.79
be important in biology 0.78
be important in physics 0.76
be important for physics 0.76
be used in physics 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(math, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(math, be used in physics)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(calculus, be connected to science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(math, be useful in science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(math, be used in physics)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(math, be important in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be useful in science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be important in physics)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important in physics)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(math, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(math, be used in physics)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mathematics, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important in physics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(calculus, be connected to science)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be integrated into computer science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be required for computer science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important in biology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(calculus, be used in physics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important for physics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be important in physics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be used in physics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(calculus, be integrated into computer science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(calculus, be used in physics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(calculus, be used in physics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(calculus, be integrated into computer science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(calculus, be useful in science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(calculus, be integrated into computer science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(calculus, be useful in science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(calculus, be required for computer science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(calculus, be useful in science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(calculus, be important in biology)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(calculus, be important in physics)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(calculus, be important for physics)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(calculus, be important in physics)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(calculus, be important in physics)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(calculus, be required for computer science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(calculus, be important in biology)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(calculus, be emphasized in computer science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(calculus, be important for physics)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(calculus, be important in biology)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(calculus, be important for physics)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(calculus, be required for computer science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(calculus, be connected to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(math, be useful in science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(math, be used in physics)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(math, be important in physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important in physics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(math, be useful in science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(math, be used in physics)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(calculus, be connected to science)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(math, be important in physics)