calculus: relate to chemical engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents math
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, course
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, algebra
Weight: 0.34
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.33
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
relate to chemical engineering 1.00
relate to engineering 0.94
be used in engineering 0.89
be needed for engineering 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(calculus, relate to chemical engineering)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(math, be used in engineering)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in engineering)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be used in engineering)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(calculus, relate to chemical engineering)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(mathematics, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be used in engineering)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(calculus, relate to chemical engineering)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(calculus, be used in engineering)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be used in engineering)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be needed for engineering)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(calculus, be used in engineering)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(calculus, be used in engineering)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(calculus, be needed for engineering)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(calculus, be needed for engineering)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(calculus, be needed for engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(calculus, relate to chemical engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(calculus, relate to chemical engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(math, be used in engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, be used in engineering)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(calculus, relate to chemical engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(math, be used in engineering)