california: be prone to earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents florida
Weight: 0.68
, new mexico
Weight: 0.67
, nation
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.63
, mexico
Weight: 0.62
Siblings los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, nevada
Weight: 0.37
, colorado
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prone to earthquakes 1.00
be susceptible to earthquakes 0.95
have earthquakes 0.93
get earthquakes 0.92
has earthquakes 0.92
have many earthquakes 0.91
get many earthquakes 0.91
be prone to earthquake activity 0.90
have strong earthquakes 0.90
be famous for all earthquakes 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(california, be prone to earthquakes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nevada, have earthquakes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(nevada, get earthquakes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(georgia, have earthquakes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(california, be prone to earthquakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(nevada, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(nevada, have earthquakes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(georgia, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(georgia, have earthquakes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(nevada, get earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(nevada, get earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(california, be prone to earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(california, have earthquakes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(california, have earthquakes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(california, have earthquakes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(california, have earthquakes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(california, have many earthquakes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(california, have many earthquakes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(california, have many earthquakes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(california, have many earthquakes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(california, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(california, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(california, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(california, be susceptible to earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(california, be prone to earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(nevada, have earthquakes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(georgia, have earthquakes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(nevada, get earthquakes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(los angeles, have earthquakes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(california, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)