california: was acquired

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents florida
Weight: 0.68
, new mexico
Weight: 0.67
, nation
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.63
, mexico
Weight: 0.62
Siblings los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, nevada
Weight: 0.37
, colorado
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was acquired 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(florida, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(california, was acquired)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new mexico, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(california, was acquired)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(new mexico, was acquired)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(florida, was acquired)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, was acquired)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(florida, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(california, was acquired)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new mexico, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(california, was acquired)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(california, was acquired)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(california, was acquired)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(california, was acquired)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new mexico, was acquired)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(florida, was acquired)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new mexico, was acquired)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(california, was acquired)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(florida, was acquired)