new mexico: was acquired

Related concepts

Parents	texas Weight: 0.74 , mexico Weight: 0.73 , north america Weight: 0.69 , country Weight: 0.65
Siblings	nevada Weight: 0.68 , los angeles Weight: 0.68 , california Weight: 0.67 , san diego Weight: 0.67 , colorado Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was acquired	1.00
was acquired by usa	0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(texas, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(new mexico, was acquired)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(texas, was acquired)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(texas, was acquired)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(california, was acquired)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(texas, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(new mexico, was acquired)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(california, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(california, was acquired)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(new mexico, was acquired)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired by usa)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(new mexico, was acquired by usa)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(new mexico, was acquired by usa)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(new mexico, was acquired by usa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(new mexico, was acquired)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(texas, was acquired)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(california, was acquired)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(new mexico, was acquired) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(texas, was acquired)