texas: was acquired

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents arizona
Weight: 0.67
, nebraska
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.60
, university
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, california
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was acquired 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(texas, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(california, was acquired)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(texas, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(california, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(california, was acquired)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(texas, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(texas, was acquired)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(texas, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(texas, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(texas, was acquired)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(texas, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(texas, was acquired)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(texas, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(california, was acquired)