california: was found

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents florida
Weight: 0.68
, new mexico
Weight: 0.67
, nation
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.63
, mexico
Weight: 0.62
Siblings los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, nevada
Weight: 0.37
, colorado
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was found 1.00
was named 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(florida, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(california, was found)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(florida, was named)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, was named)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(georgia, was found)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, was named)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(florida, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(california, was found)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(georgia, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(georgia, was found)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tennessee, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tennessee, was named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(california, was found)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(california, was named)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(california, was named)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(california, was named)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(california, was named)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(california, was found)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(california, was found)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(florida, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tennessee, was named)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(georgia, was found)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(california, was found) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(florida, was named)