calligraphy: be important to china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents art
Weight: 0.73
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, form
Weight: 0.53
Siblings needlework
Weight: 0.37
, painting
Weight: 0.36
, poetry
Weight: 0.36
, quilting
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to china 1.00
was regarded form in china 0.84
was regarded form of arts in china 0.80
was regarded highest form in china 0.78
was regarded highest form of arts in china 0.77
was regarded form of visual arts in china 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(calligraphy, be important to china)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form in china)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form in china)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form in china)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form in china)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded highest form in china)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of visual arts in china)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of visual arts in china)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of arts in china)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of visual arts in china)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded highest form in china)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of visual arts in china)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded highest form in china)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded highest form in china)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of arts in china)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of arts in china)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of arts in china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, be important to china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(calligraphy, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(calligraphy, be important to china)