calligraphy: was considered important art form

Related concepts

Parents	art Weight: 0.73 , topic Weight: 0.57 , subject Weight: 0.55 , activity Weight: 0.55 , form Weight: 0.53
Siblings	needlework Weight: 0.37 , painting Weight: 0.36 , poetry Weight: 0.36 , quilting Weight: 0.35 , pottery Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was considered important art form	1.00
was considered important art form in heian	1.00
was considered art form	0.98
was considered art form in heian	0.98
be considered art	0.93
be important in art	0.91
were important in art	0.90
was used in art	0.89
was regarded form of arts	0.89
be used in art	0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(form, be important in art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(form, be used in art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(art, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(art, be considered art)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(form, be used in art)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(form, be important in art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(form, be important in art)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(form, be used in art)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(art, be considered art)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(pottery, be considered art)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(form, be important in art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(art, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(form, be used in art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(pottery, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(pottery, be considered art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form)

Similarity expansion

0.83

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form in heian)

0.83

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(calligraphy, was considered art form in heian)

0.82

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form in heian)

0.82

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered art form)

0.82

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered art form in heian)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was considered art form in heian)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(calligraphy, was considered art form)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form in heian)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was considered art form)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(calligraphy, be considered art)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(calligraphy, was used in art)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(calligraphy, be considered art)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered art form in heian)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was used in art)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(calligraphy, be used in art)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(calligraphy, be considered art)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form in heian)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(calligraphy, was used in art)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(calligraphy, be important in art)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(calligraphy, were important in art)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(calligraphy, be important in art)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(calligraphy, be used in art)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(calligraphy, were important in art)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(calligraphy, be used in art)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(calligraphy, be important in art)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered art form)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, be considered art)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, be important in art)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was used in art)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, be used in art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(art, be considered art)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(form, be used in art)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(form, be important in art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(pottery, be considered art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(art, be considered art)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(form, be used in art)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(form, be important in art)