calligraphy: were important in art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents art
Weight: 0.73
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, form
Weight: 0.53
Siblings needlework
Weight: 0.37
, painting
Weight: 0.36
, poetry
Weight: 0.36
, quilting
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important in art 1.00
be important in art 0.97
was used in art 0.92
is art 0.91
be used in art 0.91
was considered important art form in heian 0.91
was considered important art form 0.90
be considered art 0.89
was considered art form in heian 0.88
was considered art form 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(form, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(calligraphy, were important in art)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(form, be used in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(calligraphy, were important in art)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(art, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(calligraphy, were important in art)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(art, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(calligraphy, were important in art)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(art, is art)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(form, be used in art)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(art, be considered art)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(form, be important in art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(form, be important in art)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(form, be used in art)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(art, is art)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(art, be considered art)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be considered art)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(painting, is art)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(poetry, is art)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(form, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(form, be used in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(art, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(art, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(poetry, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(poetry, is art)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(painting, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(painting, is art)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pottery, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pottery, be considered art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(calligraphy, were important in art)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(calligraphy, be important in art)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was used in art)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(calligraphy, is art)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(calligraphy, be used in art)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was used in art)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was used in art)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, is art)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(calligraphy, is art)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(calligraphy, be used in art)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, be used in art)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form in heian)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(calligraphy, be important in art)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was considered art form in heian)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, be important in art)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(calligraphy, be considered art)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was considered important art form)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form in heian)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(calligraphy, be considered art)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was considered art form in heian)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form in heian)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was considered art form)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered art form in heian)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered art form)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form in heian)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, be considered art)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered important art form)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered art form in heian)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was considered art form)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was considered important art form)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, be important in art)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered important art form)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, be considered art)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered art form)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was used in art)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, be used in art)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, is art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(calligraphy, were important in art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(art, is art)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(art, be considered art)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(form, be used in art)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(form, be important in art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(poetry, is art)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(painting, is art)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(pottery, be considered art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(art, is art)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(form, be used in art)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(art, be considered art)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(calligraphy, were important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(form, be important in art)