camel: has physical part mouths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part mouths 1.00
have weird mouths 0.90
has physical part mouth 0.89
has physical part ears 0.86
has physical part noses 0.85
has physical part lips 0.84
has physical part nostrils 0.83
have atogh mouth 0.83
has physical part teeth 0.82
has physical part tongue 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(donkey, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(donkey, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(donkey, has physical part ears)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(elephant, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(elephant, has physical part ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(camel, has physical part mouths)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part ears)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(camel, has physical part ears)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(camel, has physical part ears)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part teeth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(camel, has physical part ears)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(camel, has physical part teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(camel, has physical part teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(camel, has physical part teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part mouths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(camel, has physical part mouths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(donkey, has physical part ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part ears)