camera: be bad at night

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, human eye
Weight: 0.60
, underwater
Weight: 0.54
, cctv
Weight: 0.54
, flip
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad at night 1.00
be bad on snapchat 0.86
drive at night 0.83
be bad taking in dark 0.77
turn dome lights off at night 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(driver, drive at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(camera, be bad at night)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(driver, turn dome lights off at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(camera, be bad at night)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(driver, drive at night)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(driver, turn dome lights off at night)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(driver, drive at night)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(driver, turn dome lights off at night)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(driver, drive at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(camera, be bad at night)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(driver, turn dome lights off at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(camera, be bad at night)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(camera, be bad at night)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(camera, be bad at night)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(camera, be bad at night)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(driver, drive at night)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(driver, turn dome lights off at night)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(driver, drive at night)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(camera, be bad at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(driver, turn dome lights off at night)