camouflage: be considered adaptation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, print
Weight: 0.55
, pattern
Weight: 0.53
, design
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tan
Weight: 0.32
, hair color
Weight: 0.32
, mask
Weight: 0.32
, blue line
Weight: 0.32
, armor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered adaptation 1.00
be adaptation 0.97
is adaptation 0.97
is good adaptation 0.95
be example of adaptation 0.93
be example of evolutionary adaptation 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(camouflage, be considered adaptation)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is good adaptation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(camouflage, be adaptation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camouflage, is adaptation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(camouflage, be example of adaptation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, be example of evolutionary adaptation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(camouflage, is adaptation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(camouflage, be adaptation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(camouflage, is good adaptation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(camouflage, be example of adaptation)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(camouflage, is good adaptation)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(camouflage, is good adaptation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(camouflage, be example of evolutionary adaptation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, be example of adaptation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(camouflage, be example of evolutionary adaptation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is adaptation)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(camouflage, is adaptation)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(camouflage, be example of evolutionary adaptation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, be adaptation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(camouflage, be adaptation)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(camouflage, be example of adaptation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, be considered adaptation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camouflage, be considered adaptation)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(camouflage, be considered adaptation)