camouflage: is really needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, print
Weight: 0.55
, pattern
Weight: 0.53
, design
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tan
Weight: 0.32
, hair color
Weight: 0.32
, mask
Weight: 0.32
, blue line
Weight: 0.32
, armor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is really needed 1.00
is needed 0.90
really well find mates 0.78
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(camouflage, is really needed)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(design, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(camouflage, is really needed)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(camouflage, is really needed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(design, is needed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(design, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pattern, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(design, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(armor, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mask, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tan, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(design, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(armor, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(armor, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tan, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tan, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mask, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mask, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(camouflage, is really needed)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(camouflage, is needed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(camouflage, is needed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(camouflage, is needed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(camouflage, really well find mates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(camouflage, really well find mates)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, really well find mates)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(camouflage, really well find mates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(camouflage, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(camouflage, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(camouflage, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(camouflage, is really needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design, is needed)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(design, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(armor, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mask, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tan, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design, is needed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(design, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(camouflage, is really needed)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality good)