design: is needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is needed 1.00
is necessary 0.86
need work 0.82
need water 0.80
need know 0.78
have used for portfollios 0.76
help 0.75
need work together 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(approach, is needed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design, is needed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(layout, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design, is needed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(industry, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design, is needed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(industry, need water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design, is needed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(industry, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(approach, is needed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(layout, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(industry, need water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(industry, need water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(approach, is needed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(layout, is necessary)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(industry, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(architect, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(logo, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(prototype, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(prototype, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(architect, need know)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(architect, is necessary)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(architect, need work together)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(approach, is needed)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(design, is needed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(layout, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(design, is needed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(industry, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(design, is needed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(industry, need water)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(design, is needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(prototype, is needed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(prototype, is needed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(logo, is needed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(logo, is needed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(architect, is needed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(architect, is needed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(architect, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(architect, is necessary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(prototype, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(prototype, is necessary)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(architect, need know)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(architect, need know)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(architect, need work together)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(architect, need work together)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(design, is needed)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(design, is necessary)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(design, is necessary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(design, have used for portfollios)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(design, have used for portfollios)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(design, is necessary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(design, is necessary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(design, have used for portfollios)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(design, have used for portfollios)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(industry, is necessary)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(layout, is necessary)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(approach, is needed)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(industry, need water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(prototype, is needed)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(logo, is needed)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(architect, is needed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(architect, is necessary)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(prototype, is necessary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(architect, need work together)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(architect, need know)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(industry, is necessary)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(layout, is necessary)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(approach, is needed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(design, is needed)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(industry, need water)