camping: is illegal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adventure
Weight: 0.65
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, hobby
Weight: 0.61
, experience
Weight: 0.58
, water sport
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hiking
Weight: 0.57
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.34
, boating
Weight: 0.34
, fishing
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is illegal 1.00
be illegal in england 0.80
be live illegal bait 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fishing, is illegal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hiking, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be live illegal bait)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fishing, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fishing, is illegal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hiking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(hiking, is illegal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fishing, be live illegal bait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fishing, be live illegal bait)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(camping, is illegal)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(camping, be illegal in england)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(camping, be illegal in england)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(camping, be illegal in england)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(camping, be illegal in england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(camping, is illegal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(camping, is illegal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fishing, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(fishing, be live illegal bait)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(camping, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hiking, is illegal)