hiking: is illegal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adventure
Weight: 0.69
, camping
Weight: 0.57
, summer
Weight: 0.55
, pursuit
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings rafting
Weight: 0.36
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.35
, rock climbing
Weight: 0.35
, hike
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is illegal 1.00
be illegal in england 0.80
be under age of consent illegal 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(camping, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hiking, is illegal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(camping, be illegal in england)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hiking, is illegal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(camping, is illegal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(camping, be illegal in england)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(camping, is illegal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(camping, be illegal in england)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(camping, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(hiking, is illegal)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(camping, be illegal in england)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(hiking, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hiking, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hiking, is illegal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hiking, is illegal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(camping, is illegal)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(camping, be illegal in england)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(camping, is illegal)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(hiking, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(camping, be illegal in england)