canada: be better than australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.69
, new zealand
Weight: 0.67
, latin america
Weight: 0.66
, european union
Weight: 0.65
Siblings alaska
Weight: 0.65
, vancouver
Weight: 0.57
, australia
Weight: 0.38
, usa
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than australia 1.00
be better than usa 0.88
be better than india 0.88
better country than usa 0.86
be better than spain 0.85
be better than england 0.85
be bigger than usa 0.84
be than america 0.81
be colder than europe 0.79
be in usa 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(north america, be colder than europe)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canada, be better than australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(north america, be colder than europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(north america, be colder than europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than australia)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than india)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(alaska, be in usa)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(australia, be better than india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(north america, be colder than europe)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(canada, be better than australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(usa, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(usa, be better than australia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(australia, be better than india)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(australia, be better than india)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(usa, be better than india)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(usa, be better than india)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(alaska, be in usa)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(alaska, be in usa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(canada, be better than australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canada, be better than australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(north america, be colder than europe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(usa, be better than australia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(alaska, be in usa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(usa, be better than india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(australia, be better than india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(north america, be colder than europe)