usa: be better than australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new zealand
Weight: 0.68
, latin america
Weight: 0.62
, japan
Weight: 0.58
, nation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings european union
Weight: 0.67
, canada
Weight: 0.38
, india
Weight: 0.37
, saudi arabia
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than australia 1.00
be better than canada 0.91
be better than uk 0.89
be better than india 0.88
be cheaper than canada 0.87
be better than europe 0.85
compare to canada 0.80
is usa 0.77
be better than china 0.77
be called usa 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(canada, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(canada, be better than australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(usa, be better than australia)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(usa, be cheaper than canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(usa, be cheaper than canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(usa, is usa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than canada)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(usa, be better than europe)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(usa, be cheaper than canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than india)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(usa, be better than canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than uk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(usa, be better than uk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(usa, be better than canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than europe)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(usa, be better than europe)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(usa, be better than india)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(usa, is usa)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than china)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(usa, be called usa)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(usa, be better than canada)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(usa, be better than india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(usa, be better than uk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(usa, be better than europe)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(usa, be better than india)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(usa, be called usa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(usa, be called usa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(usa, be cheaper than canada)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(usa, be better than uk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(usa, is usa)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(usa, be called usa)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(usa, be better than china)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(usa, is usa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(usa, be better than china)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(usa, be better than china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(usa, be better than australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canada, be better than australia)