usa: be better than china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new zealand
Weight: 0.68
, latin america
Weight: 0.62
, japan
Weight: 0.58
, nation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings european union
Weight: 0.67
, canada
Weight: 0.38
, india
Weight: 0.37
, saudi arabia
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than china 1.00
be better than india 0.80
be better than europe 0.79
be better than canada 0.78
be better than uk 0.78
be better than australia 0.77
be cheaper than canada 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(canada, be better than australia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(canada, be better than australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(usa, be better than china)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(usa, be better than europe)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(usa, be cheaper than canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(usa, be cheaper than canada)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(usa, be better than india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(usa, be better than canada)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(usa, be better than uk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(usa, be cheaper than canada)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(usa, be better than australia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(usa, be better than europe)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(usa, be better than india)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(usa, be better than australia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(usa, be better than canada)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(usa, be better than uk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(usa, be cheaper than canada)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(usa, be better than europe)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(usa, be better than australia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(usa, be better than india)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(usa, be better than canada)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than india)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(usa, be better than uk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than australia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than canada)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than europe)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(usa, be better than china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(usa, be better than china)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canada, be better than australia)