canada: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.69
, new zealand
Weight: 0.67
, latin america
Weight: 0.66
, european union
Weight: 0.65
Siblings alaska
Weight: 0.65
, vancouver
Weight: 0.57
, australia
Weight: 0.38
, usa
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00
was east formed 0.88
was founded 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, was formed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canada, was formed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new zealand, was founded)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canada, was formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was founded)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(alaska, was founded)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, was formed)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(canada, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new zealand, was founded)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(canada, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(alaska, was founded)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(alaska, was founded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(canada, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(canada, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canada, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new zealand, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new zealand, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(alaska, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new zealand, was formed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(canada, was formed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new zealand, was founded)