new zealand: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.71
, north america
Weight: 0.70
, europe
Weight: 0.69
, south africa
Weight: 0.69
Siblings new caledonia
Weight: 0.71
, tasmania
Weight: 0.71
, usa
Weight: 0.68
, south korea
Weight: 0.67
, canada
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00
was founded 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, was formed)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(canada, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(canada, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(canada, was formed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(tasmania, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(new zealand, was formed)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was founded)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new zealand, was founded)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was founded)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(new zealand, was founded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new zealand, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tasmania, was formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canada, was formed)