tasmania: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new zealand
Weight: 0.71
, place
Weight: 0.63
, island
Weight: 0.62
, state
Weight: 0.60
, country
Weight: 0.59
Siblings india
Weight: 0.35
, usa
Weight: 0.35
, england
Weight: 0.35
, argentina
Weight: 0.35
, central african republic
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(island, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tasmania, was formed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tasmania, was formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(island, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(island, was formed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(island, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(tasmania, was formed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(tasmania, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(tasmania, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tasmania, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new zealand, was formed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(island, was formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new zealand, was formed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(tasmania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(island, was formed)