candidate: be awarded votes from state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.60
, activist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings third party
Weight: 0.69
, general election
Weight: 0.65
, congressman
Weight: 0.63
, democrat
Weight: 0.63
, libertarian
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be awarded votes from state 1.00
get votes 0.87
lose votes 0.85
win votes 0.85
get many votes 0.84
get electoral votes 0.80
gets electoral votes 0.80
get how many votes 0.79
gets many electoral votes 0.79
get many electoral votes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(candidate, be awarded votes from state)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(candidate, lose votes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(candidate, win votes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(candidate, lose votes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(candidate, lose votes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(candidate, get how many votes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(candidate, lose votes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(candidate, get how many votes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(candidate, win votes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(candidate, get how many votes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(candidate, win votes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(candidate, win votes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(candidate, get how many votes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be awarded votes from state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(candidate, be awarded votes from state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(candidate, be awarded votes from state)