candidate: lose votes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.60
, activist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings third party
Weight: 0.69
, general election
Weight: 0.65
, congressman
Weight: 0.63
, democrat
Weight: 0.63
, libertarian
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
lose votes 1.00
get votes 0.94
win votes 0.92
get many votes 0.92
get electoral votes 0.86
get many electoral votes 0.86
get how many votes 0.86
be awarded votes from state 0.85
gets electoral votes 0.85
gets many electoral votes 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(candidate, lose votes)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(candidate, get how many votes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(candidate, win votes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(candidate, be awarded votes from state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(candidate, get how many votes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(candidate, win votes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(candidate, be awarded votes from state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(candidate, get how many votes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(candidate, win votes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(candidate, be awarded votes from state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(candidate, win votes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be awarded votes from state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(candidate, get how many votes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(candidate, lose votes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(candidate, lose votes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(candidate, lose votes)