candidate: be chosen in political party

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.60
, activist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings third party
Weight: 0.69
, general election
Weight: 0.65
, congressman
Weight: 0.63
, democrat
Weight: 0.63
, libertarian
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be chosen in political party 1.00
be chosen in party 0.94
be labeled by party 0.80
were for presidency chosen 0.79
were for president chosen during democracy 0.79
were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy 0.79
were for presidency chosen time 0.79
be chosen run for office 0.77
be chosen run 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(candidate, be chosen in political party)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(candidate, be chosen in party)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(candidate, be chosen in party)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(candidate, be chosen in party)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(candidate, be labeled by party)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(candidate, be chosen run)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(candidate, be labeled by party)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(candidate, were for presidency chosen)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(candidate, be labeled by party)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(candidate, were for presidency chosen time)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(candidate, were for president chosen during democracy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(candidate, be chosen run)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(candidate, were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(candidate, be chosen run)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(candidate, be chosen run for office)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(candidate, were for presidency chosen)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(candidate, were for presidency chosen time)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(candidate, were for president chosen during democracy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(candidate, were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(candidate, be chosen run for office)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be chosen in party)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(candidate, were for presidency chosen)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(candidate, were for presidency chosen time)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(candidate, be chosen run for office)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(candidate, were for president chosen during democracy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(candidate, were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be labeled by party)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for president chosen during democracy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for presidency chosen)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for presidency chosen time)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be chosen run for office)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be chosen run)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be chosen in political party)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be chosen in political party)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(candidate, be chosen in political party)