candidate: be labeled by party

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.60
, activist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings third party
Weight: 0.69
, general election
Weight: 0.65
, congressman
Weight: 0.63
, democrat
Weight: 0.63
, libertarian
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be labeled by party 1.00
be chosen in party 0.81
be chosen in political party 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(candidate, be labeled by party) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(candidate, be labeled by party)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(candidate, be labeled by party) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(candidate, be chosen in party)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(candidate, be labeled by party) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(candidate, be chosen in political party)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(candidate, be labeled by party) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(candidate, be chosen in party)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(candidate, be labeled by party) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(candidate, be chosen in political party)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(candidate, be labeled by party) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(candidate, be chosen in party)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(candidate, be labeled by party) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(candidate, be chosen in political party)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(candidate, be labeled by party) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be chosen in political party)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(candidate, be labeled by party) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be chosen in party)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(candidate, be labeled by party) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(candidate, be labeled by party) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be labeled by party)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(candidate, be labeled by party) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(candidate, be labeled by party)