candidate: be for president nominated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.60
, activist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings third party
Weight: 0.69
, general election
Weight: 0.65
, congressman
Weight: 0.63
, democrat
Weight: 0.63
, libertarian
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for president nominated 1.00
be for president officially nominated 0.94
be nominated for office 0.92
were for president chosen 0.86
were for president chosen in jeffersonian 0.86
be for president 0.81
running for president 0.80
were for president 0.79
were for president chosen during democracy 0.78
were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(general election, be for president)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(general election, be for president)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(general election, be for president)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(candidate, be for president nominated)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(candidate, be for president officially nominated)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(candidate, be nominated for office)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(candidate, be for president officially nominated)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(candidate, be nominated for office)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(candidate, be for president officially nominated)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(candidate, be nominated for office)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(candidate, were for president chosen)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(candidate, were for president chosen in jeffersonian)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(candidate, were for president chosen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(candidate, running for president)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(candidate, were for president chosen in jeffersonian)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(candidate, be for president)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(candidate, were for president chosen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(candidate, were for president)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(candidate, were for president chosen in jeffersonian)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be for president officially nominated)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(candidate, be for president)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(candidate, running for president)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(candidate, running for president)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(candidate, be for president)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(candidate, were for president)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(candidate, were for president chosen during democracy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(candidate, were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(candidate, were for president)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(candidate, running for president)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be nominated for office)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for president chosen)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(candidate, were for president chosen during democracy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(candidate, were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for president chosen in jeffersonian)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(candidate, were for president chosen during democracy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(candidate, were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for president)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be for president)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for president chosen during democracy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be for president nominated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(candidate, be for president nominated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be for president nominated)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(general election, be for president)